With the presidential election getting closer, emails of a political nature keep a coming. Most of these come from hopefully well meaning friends. Often the message concludes with a dire warning like "our country's future is at stake" and requests that I forward the email to all my other internet friends. The problem with many of these emails is that they are lies, plain and simple, lies! - not just a difference of opinion. I don't want to spread these lies and I feel that if I just delete the message, I'm in a way endorsing the sender's lies. What to do? First a little background.
If you believe that politicians never deliberately lie, stop reading right now. You're hopeless. While it is sometimes by omission, taking statements out of context, etc., almost all politicians stretch the truth. Maybe that's one of the reasons that the approval rating of Congress, aka the millionaire's club, has been hovering around 10% for quite some time. Ethics is not their strong suit. I liked the woman in the Occupy movement who had a sign that read something like "I'm carrying this sign because I can't afford to buy a congressman".
This situation is not new:
I'm sure that many readers are familiar with this famous quote from Mark Twain: "It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress".
Ambrose Bierce in his "Devil's Dictionary" defined politics as "n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." (The Devil's Dictionary can be found on-line.)
More recently, country singer Brad Paisley's song "I'll Take You Back" is about a guy who in effect is saying that he'll get back together with his ex-wife or lover when hell freezes over. In one verse he sings that he'll take her back "when politicians everywhere stop telling lies, and only state the facts".
One of my ways to determine the veracity of these political emails is to check certain websites devoted to uncovering false statements. I haven't read of any complaints about them. They seem to be bi-partisan. If they favored one party over another, they would lose all credibility.
PolitiFact.com is said to be a project of the Tampa Bay Times to help you find the truth in Washington and the Obama presidency. They aren't picking on President Obama; they also review comments from the Republicans hoping to unseat him. Statements are characterized as true, mostly true, half true, false, mostly false and whoppers are characterized as "pants on fire" as in "liar, liar, pants on fire".
www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker is another source. The Fact Checker by Glenn Kessler describes itself as "the Truth Behind the Rhetoric". It awards up to 4 Pinocchio's depending on the extent of the lie.
Snopes is broader based, not specifically focussing on politics. Snopes.com describes itself as the definitive internet reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.
When I receive a false email, I reply to the sender with a copy of the data I found on the above websites.
Sometimes a slick sender will claim that the information being forwarded has been verified by Snopes. Don't assume this to be true. Check out the citation yourself. I have gotten emails where the Snopes article referenced did not support the lie they were spreading.